A Method To Their Madness: The Hegelian Dialectic And False Flag Operations

By Jayne Gardener

What is the Hegelian Dialectic? Wikipedia explains it:

"Hegelian dialectic, usually presented in a three-fold manner, was stated by Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus as comprising three dialectical stages of development: a thesis, giving rise to its reaction, an antithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis, and the tension between the two being resolved by means of a synthesis.

Although this model is often named after the German philosopher George Hegel, he himself never used that specific formulation. Hegel ascribed that terminology to Kant. Carrying on Kant's work, Fichte greatly elaborated on the synthesis model, and popularized it.

On the other hand, Hegel did use a three-valued logical model that is very similar to the antithesis model, but Hegel's most usual terms were: Abstract-Negative-Concrete. Sometimes Hegel would use the terms, Immediate-Mediated-Concrete. Hegel used these terms hundreds of times throughout his works."

In easier to understand terms, according to the Freedom Dictionary online, it is:

"An interpretive method, originally used to relate specific entities or events to the absolute idea, in which an assertable proposition (thesis) is necessarily opposed by its apparent contradiction (antithesis), and both reconciled on a higher level of truth by a third proposition (synthesis). Also called Hegelian triad."

Even more simply put, it is the process of creating a problem (thesis) to which there will be a reaction and demands for a solution (antithesis) leading to a solution (synthesis). This has been used repeatedly by our Zionist masters to control the minds of the American people and lead them towards solutions that they would not, under other circumstances, accept.

The most common use of this process has been by Zionist Neo-Conservative warmongers in the "false flag" operations that have been carried out to a political end, usually war against another country, or the so-called Cold War, or as in the "war on terror," against "radical Islam."

This process has been used successfully and diabolically throughout many periods of history and in modern times one can point to such examples as the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana harbor on February 15th, 1898 which precipitated the Spanish-American War as well as the sinking of the Lusitania on May 7th, 1915 which was used to garner rage in the American public and as a result, to bring the United States into WW1.

The sad part of this means of arriving at a solution commonly does so at the expense of much suffering and loss of human life. On the Lusitania alone, 1,198 of the 1,959 souls on board perished.

In 1941, during the presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Winston Churchill and Roosevelt both conspired to bring the United States into the second World War on the side of the allies. Knowing that the American people were not in favour of another war after the carnage of the first Great War, they needed to devise a means by which to persuade the American people that a war was the right course of action.

It was decided that Roosevelt would employ means by which to goad the Japanese into attacking the American fleet which he had ordered moved from San Diego to Pearl Harbour. Since that "day of infamy" it has become not so common knowledge that Roosevelt had prior knowledge of the attack and did absolutely nothing to prevent it.

According to Michael Collins Piper in his book Dirty Secrets: Crime, Conspiracy and Cover-up During the 20th Century, Secretary of State to FDR, Cordell Hull, contacted an American journalist, Joseph Lieb, meeting with him on November 28, 1941 to inform him that the Japanese were planning to attack Pearl Harbor within a few days and had in his possession Japanese radio transcripts intercepted by American Intelligence which he handed over to Lieb. When pressed for more information, Hull admitted that this foreknowledge of the impending attack went "all the way to the Whitehouse."

After promising Hull that he would not reveal his source, Lieb approached his United Press bureau chief who refused to believe the tale and print Lieb's story. A former cable editor at United Press did agree to transmit the story but did so in a way that rendered the final version incomplete. Only one newspaper, ironically in Honolulu, ultimately carried the story, although it failed to mention that the attack would be on Pearl Harbor itself.

On December 7, 1941, under the command of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Pearl Harbor was attacked, just as Secretary Hull had related to Joseph Lieb. Overall, nine ships of the U.S. fleet were sunk and 21 ships were severely damaged. Three of the 21 would be irreparable. The overall death toll reached 2,350, including 68 civilians, and 1,178 injured. Of the military personnel lost at Pearl Harbor, 1,177 were from the Arizona.

How is it possible that an American president could allow such an attack to take place with all its attendant loss of life? Hard as it is to believe, these Zionist monsters simply don't care about the lives destroyed or lost, they are simply a means to an end. Their mantra has always been "the end justifies the means."

The men trapped in the Arizona at the bottom of the ocean at Pearl Harbor were simply a means by which the FDR administration could enrage Americans against the Japanese and bring them around to supporting his war. A brilliant, albeit decidedly evil and machiavellian strategy.

Twenty-some years later, this same strategy was employed by President Lyndon Baines Johnson, who needed to win the approval of the American citizenry to escalate the conflagration in Vietnam, a war in which many Americans felt they should have no role.

On August 2, 1964, the destroyer USS Maddox engaged three North Vietnamese P-4 torpedo boats, resulting in damage to the three boats. Two days later the Maddox (having been joined by the destroyer USS Turner Joy) reported a second engagement with North Vietnamese vessels.

The outcome of the incident was the passage by Congress of the Southeast Asia Resolution (better known as the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution), which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by "communist aggression," including the commitment of U.S. forces without a declaration of war.

The resolution served as Johnson's legal justification for escalating American involvement in the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam). It gave the President the exclusive right to use military force without consulting the Senate. The president later admitted that this was based on a false pretext. The Gulf of Tonkin lie was later exposed by a declassified official NSA report in 2005 which revealed that the Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese on August 2, but that there may not have been any North Vietnamese vessels present during the engagement of August 4. It was not a case of differing stories as to what happened on the night of August 4th, it is a fact that nothing happened that night other than Hanoi's navy being engaged in salvaging the two boats which had been damaged on August 2nd.

The first Gulf War, launched by President George H.W. Bush in 1990 was just another in a long line of incidents provoked by lies told by the American government to the American people. A pre-emptive war against Iraq was not supported by the majority of Americans until a young, tearful girl appeared before Congress with her tales of Iraqi soldiers entering Kuwait hospitals and dumping newborn babies out of their incubators and onto the cold floor where they were left to die. It later came to light that the young girl in question was no other than the daughter of the American Ambassador to Iraq but by then the damage was done and a war was underway.

The most recent and probably the most devastating example of the Hegelian Dialectic happened on September 11, 2001 when, we are to believe, "Islamic fanatics" hijacked American passenger planes and flew them into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon, while ostensibly, the last one was taken over by passengers and crashed outside Shanksville Pennsylvania.

The official story as drafted by the official September 11 Commission has more holes in it than a block of swiss cheese but we are supposed to believe that these 19 Islamic nutcases belonging to "Al Qaeda" were able to pull off the terrorist attack of the millenium, thwarting NORAD, the FAA and the American Air Force among others while our illustrious leaders lied, deceived and obfuscated as to their whereabouts as well as what they knew and when they knew it.

The Neo-Conservative think tank called the Project for A New American Century had made it very clear that they wanted to take out the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq and spoke of needing a "new Pearl Harbor" to bring the American populace around to their deluded way of thinking.

How convenient that, shortly after the installation of the Neo-Con president, George Bush Jr. in 2000, they were rewarded by a "surprise attack" on American soil and within a matter of hours were able to pin it on the responsible party.

If you believe the official version of this calamity, I have some swampland in Arizona for you to purchase. There are only three possible solutions to the mystery of the September 11 attacks. The first is that the attacks happened exactly the way the 9/11 Commision Report claims, that America was blindsided by a completely surprise attack by 19 radical Muslims flying passenger planes into buildings.

This is about as ludicrous to me as believing the magic bullet nonsense dreamed up by the Warren Commission who were given the job of explaining (read covering up) the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

The second explanation for 9/11 is that the American government knew of the impending attack but did nothing to stop it, either because they wanted it to happen or because the intelligence gathered was not sufficient to elucidate where, when and how the attack was to take place.

The third explanation is far more ominous and in my opinion, far more likely and that is the belief that the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States was a joint operation between the Neo-Cons in the Bush administration, the CIA and likely the Mossad and was carried out to put the fear of terrorism into each American in order to garner support for yet another foreign war. As an added benefit, as per the Hegelian Dialectic, they have also used the attack (thesis) and the result (fear) to implement the Patriot Act which deprives Americans of certain rights (synthesis.)

It is an age old practice and one that has been surprisingly effective. I'm sure most countries have, at some point, engaged the dialectic to sell an unpopular war to its population or as a justification for restricting rights. We certainly know that Israel is no stranger to false flag operations as proven by the Lavon affair and the unprecedented and unprovoked attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967.

It goes without saying that the Neo-Cons in the Bush administration are complicit in the deaths of more than 3,000 innocent American citizens and should be held accountable. What they have committed and covered up is nothing short of an act of treason and over 3,000 counts of murder, not even counting the number of American military personnel killed or wounded nor the number of Iraqi citizens who have died since the war was launched in March of 2003.

As a result of what I have learned in reading about these false flag operations, otherwise known as state terror, I no longer accept similar news unquestioningly. When a so-called terrorist attack occurs, the first question I ask myself is who stands to gain from this? Sadly, the answer is usually the same insane group of lunatics, namely American Zionists working in tandem with the state of Israel.

We have to stop being swayed by the emotionalism of these incidents and not allow the government to use them to win us over to their nefarious plans. Otherwise, they will continue and we will be at perpetual war. Just as the government used the specter of the Soviet Union to justify their arms build-up, they are now replacing the Soviet bogeyman with "radical Islam" in order to promote endless war between Islam and the west, all with the aim of making Israel the predominant middle eastern power and gaining control of all middle eastern oil in the process.

Once we understand how the Hegelian Dialectic is used to their advantage, we can thwart their plans by refusing to be swayed by their repeated fear-mongering and by standing firm against being embroiled in yet another senseless war.

It is indeed time to wake up and smell the coffee.