Pages

Monday, April 13, 2009

Why do the Police Need to Wear Masks



IT'S A balaclava, apparently. No doubt it will be described as essential protective dress. But looking at the video film and photographs of the "territorial support group officer" who has just taken his baton to Ian Tomlinson minutes before the newspaper vendor's death, I'm wondering: why does a British policeman in pursuance of his duties feel the need to be masked?

There's another mystery. In one still, Tomlinson is sitting on the ground before the police line, being aided by a stranger. There are eight helmeted officers and two dog handlers in shot. Of these, only three have balaclavas. Two wear the garment normally, covering the chin. The third, having stepped aside after his attack on the passer-by, has the thing high on his face, leaving only the eyes showing. And his shoulder tabs, the tabs bearing his police number, have gone.

That's an old one. It is, of course, against all the rules. The number is there for a reason, in theory to the benefit of police and public alike should disputes arise. Traditionally, we don't much care for masked and anonymous coppers in a country said to cherish the right to protest. After all, the forces of law and order, repositories of public trust, have nothing to hide.

3 comments:

  1. These weaklings strength lies on the outside
    where the corrupt "system" wants it to be.
    lts the inner strength that frightens the controllers, these fools are easy fodder for the systems agenda.
    They are ba ba ba yes sir 3 bags full men they
    do not possess the roar within they will go
    down with the systems agenda...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Steevin

    How did Icke's talk go?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very well recieved by a bright section of Melbourne minds young and older.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for your comment it is much appreciated.